155 hits and not one reply .
155 hits and not one reply .I don’t think this is a very large engine . And would probably fit in the Maverick well , but it’s off limits until Ford puts the 3.0 into the Ranger .
So what would you be willing to pay for a 2024 Maverick with the V6 2.7 Eco-boost in it ?
I’m thinking FX4 and $30,000
So what if it was a 2.7 V6 Eco boost hybrid with a 8 speed transmission.Nothing. I'm just here for the hybrid. It's the whole point so far as I'm concerned.
I see no point AT ALL in a V6 hybrid. You either want fuel economy or extra power. But you have to choose.So what if it was a 2.7 V6 Eco boost hybrid with a 8 speed transmission.
Doesn't change the equation whatsoever. You defeat the whole purpose of the Hybrid with its super MPG even at the cost of lower towing ability. This is the demand that Ford is booking on. You might as well just get a bigger truck.So what if it was a 2.7 V6 Eco boost hybrid with a 8 speed transmission.
Doesn‘t appear that many of us would find that worth paying for. When you start doing all these bigger engines then the whole point of this little truck to be a low end value model is lost.
I suspect Ford is seriously crunching the numbers between what you propose on a more powerful ice (internal combustion engine) power plant AND a full electric sport Maverick that could blow the doors off the 2.7 eco boost 0-60 times. Auto companies are seeing the writing on the wall as far as the future of ice motors.I don’t think this is a very large engine . And would probably fit in the Maverick well , but it’s off limits until Ford puts the 3.0 into the Ranger .
So what would you be willing to pay for a 2024 Maverick with the V6 2.7 Eco-boost in it ?
I’m thinking FX4 and $30,000
Ford F-150 has I believe a 3.5 eco boost hybrid that has very high towing capacity, is very fast and gets better mileage than the V8 version. It is also faster than V8 and it Also costs more than the V8. See for yourself on YouTube SFL trucksI see no point AT ALL in a V6 hybrid. You either want fuel economy or extra power. But you have to choose.
I believe most of what you wrote here are mutually exclusive concepts.So what if it was a 2.7 V6 Eco boost hybrid with a 8 speed transmission.
An 11 second Maverick and 25 MPG for $.29,995. Ford used to put a V6 in the Escape and it would be easy .I don’t think this is a very large engine . And would probably fit in the Maverick well , but it’s off limits until Ford puts the 3.0 into the Ranger .
So what would you be willing to pay for a 2024 Maverick with the V6 2.7 Eco-boost in it ?
I’m thinking FX4 and $30,000
I would be willing to pay a bit more for a V6, better towing capacity & power. Need to know if this could happen as ready to purchase the XLT AWD with towing package.I don’t think this is a very large engine . And would probably fit in the Maverick well , but it’s off limits until Ford puts the 3.0 into the Ranger .
So what would you be willing to pay for a 2024 Maverick with the V6 2.7 Eco-boost in it ?
I’m thinking FX4 and $30,000
If you want to tow 10,000 lbs, get a bigger truck, the Maverick is a hobby truck, not a Big Boy hauler!From the Hybrid, it's + $1,085 to upgrade to the 2.0L EcoBoost. Depending on the peak HP and peak torque, I would probably go + 2,500 (from hybrid) on a 2.7L V6 EcoBoost. Especially if it could get the GCWR up to 10,000 lbs.